Tuesday, 20 November 2012

Government Claims Misleading - An Unsatisfactory Apprentice Programme


The Government boasts that in 2011, around 457,000 people started an apprenticeship. This is a 63.5  per cent increase on the previous year. They claim the Government’s Apprenticeship Programme is now the "gold standard vocational qualification". However unemployment among 16 to 24-year-olds remains high at almost 21% .
To my mind, apprenticeships have been seriously devalued.  When I left school any young person who secured an apprenticeship knew that he or she would be given the opportunity to gain marketable skills that would stand them in good stead for the rest of their working lives. More importantly, the apprentice and the employer entered into an informal contract that bound them together for the five years it took to graduate as a ‘journeyman’ tradesman. There was an *unwritten agreement that in normal circumstances the apprentice’s position was guaranteed.  I know from experience that when times were lean and men were ‘layed off’, the apprentice’s job was secure. But times have changed.    


The Government recently reclassified the official definition of an apprenticeship to include training that extends as little as a year

During 2011, 51.8% of apprenticeships for 16 to 18- year-olds were completed in less than 12 months. The 12-month minimum change, introduced from August this year, is likely to result in 65,000 extra apprenticeships each year, or their reclassification as pre-apprenticeships.

 Morrisons Supermarkets, for example reclassified existing employees as apprentices.  It turns out that one in 10 of the apprenticeships created in England last year was at Morrisons' supermarkets. Also most of the 52,000 apprentices at the supermarket were existing employees who were over 25. These apprenticeships last an average of 28 weeks. 


* At one time, of course, apprenticeships involved a written contract. 

Thursday, 8 November 2012

Bradley Wiggins and the People's Court


Tour de France  winner, Bradley Wiggins was thrown off his bike when a white Vauxhall Astra Envoy is thought to have pulled out of a petrol station and collided with him. His injuries were thought to be very serious at first, but later it appeared he suffered a number of broken ribs and cuts and bruises.

Wiggins' accident has sparked a flurry of comments on Twitter -- some sympathetic, others highlighting the dangers cyclists face on the road, or the risk they pose to other road users if they don't ride responsibly.

I wonder how much blame attaches to the driver in such a case.  On the face of it the driver entering a junction is obviously in the wrong. You just shouldn’t pull out until you can see your way is clear. But can there any extenuating circumstances? Perhaps at subconscious level some drivers just don’t register a bicycle as a fully authentic road user. In other words: if it’s not a car or bus they just don’t ‘see’ it.

Maybe a defence lawyer might argue that that Bradley (world’s fastest man on two wheels) was travelling faster than a motorist might have reasonably expected.  But I don’t really think that defence would stand up.


So, my sympathies lie completely with poor Bradley and Britain’s cyclists. Therefore: GUILTY and 6 points on her licence.....

Next case.......